Designer Brands Stock Total Debt
| DBI Stock | USD 9.66 0.33 3.54% |
Designer Brands fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Designer Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Designer Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Designer Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Designer Brands stock.
The current Total Debt To Capitalization is estimated to decrease to 0.02. Designer | Total Debt |
Designer Brands Company Total Debt Analysis
Designer Brands' Total Debt refers to the amount of long term interest-bearing liabilities that a company carries on its balance sheet. That may include bonds sold to the public, notes written to banks or capital leases. Typically, debt can help a company magnify its earnings, but the burden of interest and principal payments will eventually prevent the firm from borrow excessively.
Current Designer Brands Total Debt | 1.24 B |
Most of Designer Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Total Debt, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Designer Brands is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Designer Total Debt Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Designer Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Designer Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Total Debt. Since Designer Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Designer Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Designer Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Designer Total Debt Historical Pattern
Today, most investors in Designer Brands Stock are looking for potential investment opportunities by analyzing not only static indicators but also various Designer Brands' growth ratios. Consistent increases or drops in fundamental ratios usually indicate a possible pattern that can be successfully translated into profits. However, when comparing two companies, knowing each company's total debt growth rates may not be enough to decide which company is a better investment. That's why investors frequently use a static breakdown of Designer Brands total debt as a starting point in their analysis.
Designer Brands Total Debt |
| Timeline |
In most industries, total debt may also include the current portion of long-term debt. Since debt terms vary widely from one company to another, simply comparing outstanding debt obligations between different companies may not be adequate. It is usually meant to compare total debt amounts between companies that operate within the same sector.
| Competition |
Designer Long Term Debt
Long Term Debt |
|
Based on the latest financial disclosure, Designer Brands has a Total Debt of 1.24 B. This is 67.86% lower than that of the Specialty Retail sector and significantly higher than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The total debt for all United States stocks is 76.68% higher than that of the company.
Designer Total Debt Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Designer Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Total Debt to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Designer Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Designer Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in total debt category among related companies.
Designer Brands Institutional Holders
Institutional Holdings refers to the ownership stake in Designer Brands that is held by large financial organizations, pension funds or endowments. Institutions may purchase large blocks of Designer Brands' outstanding shares and can exert considerable influence upon its management. Institutional holders may also work to push the share price higher once they own the stock. Extensive social media coverage, TV shows, articles in high-profile magazines, and presentations at investor conferences help move the stock higher, increasing Designer Brands' value.| Shares | William Blair Investment Management, Llc | 2023-12-31 | 1 M | American Century Companies Inc | 2023-12-31 | 984.9 K | Geode Capital Management, Llc | 2023-12-31 | 945.5 K | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2023-12-31 | 887.3 K | Royce & Associates, Lp | 2023-12-31 | 667 K | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 2023-12-31 | 659.9 K | Brandywine Global Investment Mgmt Llc | 2023-12-31 | 650.4 K | Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management Llc | 2023-12-31 | 578.5 K | Prudential Financial Inc | 2023-12-31 | 563.2 K | Pacer Advisors, Inc. | 2023-12-31 | 8.3 M | Blackrock Inc | 2023-12-31 | 7.2 M |
Designer Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.0732 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0208 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.06) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.75 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 49.51 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 18.04 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 81.96 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 11.29 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 7.22 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 1.32 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.15 X | ||||
| Revenue | 3.07 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 1.08 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 143.49 M | ||||
| Net Income | 29.06 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 58.77 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.79 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.24 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.23 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.35 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 6.28 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 162.4 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 6.20 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 0.46 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.61 X | ||||
| Target Price | 11.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 14 K | ||||
| Beta | 2.07 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 552.94 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 2.29 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 98.9 M | ||||
| Working Capital | 155.16 M | ||||
| Current Asset | 474.63 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 191.01 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.02 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 5.31 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 2.29 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.2 |
About Designer Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Designer Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Designer Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Designer Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Designer Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Designer Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Designer Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
| 0.82 | HD | Home Depot Financial Report 21st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | AEO | American Eagle Outfitters Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | ANF | Abercrombie Fitch Financial Report 22nd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Designer Stock
| 0.41 | UCAR | U Power Limited | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Designer Brands Piotroski F Score and Designer Brands Altman Z Score analysis. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
| Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.74) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 0.46 | Revenue Per Share 50.166 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.