Designer Brands Stock Earnings Per Share
| DBI Stock | USD 9.46 0.02 0.21% |
Designer Brands fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Designer Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Designer Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Designer Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Designer Brands stock.
Designer |
Designer Brands Company Earnings Per Share Analysis
Designer Brands' Earnings per Share (EPS) denotes the portion of a company's earnings that is allocated to each share of common stock. To calculate Earnings per Share investors will need to take a company's net income, subtract any dividends for preferred stock, and divide it by the number of average outstanding shares. EPS is usually presented in two different ways: basic and diluted. Fully diluted Earnings per Share takes into account effects of warrants, options, and convertible securities and is generally viewed by analysts as a more accurate measure.
Current Designer Brands Earnings Per Share | 0.46 X |
Most of Designer Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Earnings Per Share, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Designer Brands is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Earnings per Share is one of the most critical measures of the firm's current share price and is used by investors to determine the overall company profitability, especially when compared to the EPS of similar companies.
| Competition |
According to the company disclosure, Designer Brands has an Earnings Per Share of 0.46 times. This is 78.3% lower than that of the Specialty Retail sector and significantly higher than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The earnings per share for all United States stocks is 85.26% higher than that of the company.
Designer Earnings Per Share Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Designer Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Earnings Per Share to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Designer Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Designer Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in earnings per share category among related companies.
Designer Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.0732 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0208 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.06) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.75 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 50.03 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 15.78 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 97.75 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 12.34 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 7.22 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 1.32 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 0.15 X | ||||
| Revenue | 3.07 B | ||||
| Gross Profit | 1.08 B | ||||
| EBITDA | 143.49 M | ||||
| Net Income | 29.06 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 58.77 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.79 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 1.24 B | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 3.23 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.35 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 6.28 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 162.4 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 9.50 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 0.46 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | 2.61 X | ||||
| Target Price | 11.0 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 14 K | ||||
| Beta | 2.09 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 556.84 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 2.29 B | ||||
| Retained Earnings | 98.9 M | ||||
| Working Capital | 155.16 M | ||||
| Current Asset | 474.63 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 191.01 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.02 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 5.31 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 2.29 B | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.2 |
About Designer Brands Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Designer Brands's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Designer Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Designer Brands based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
| 0.79 | HD | Home Depot Earnings Call Today | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | CAL | Continental Financial Report 6th of June 2024 | PairCorr |
Moving against Designer Stock
| 0.49 | JZ | Jianzhi Education Report 4th of October 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Designer Brands Piotroski F Score and Designer Brands Altman Z Score analysis. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
| Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.