Computer Modelling Group Stock Net Asset
| CMG Stock | CAD 11.91 0.21 1.79% |
Computer Modelling Group fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Computer Modelling's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Computer Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Computer Modelling's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Computer Modelling stock.
Computer | Net Asset |
Computer Modelling Group Company Net Asset Analysis
Computer Modelling's Net Asset is the current market value of a fund less its liabilities. In a nutshell, if the fund is liquidated or all of the assets is sold out, the net asset will be the amount that the shareholders would demand back from the fund.
Current Computer Modelling Net Asset | 172.37 M |
Most of Computer Modelling's fundamental indicators, such as Net Asset, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Computer Modelling Group is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.
Computer Net Asset Driver Correlations
Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Computer Modelling is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Computer Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Net Asset. Since Computer Modelling's main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Computer Modelling's historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Computer Modelling's interrelated accounts and indicators.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Net Asset is the value used in calculating NAV of a fund. NAV (or Net Asset Value) is computed once a day based on the formula that uses closing prices of all positions in the fund's portfolio.
| Competition |
Computer Total Assets
Total Assets |
|
Based on the recorded statements, Computer Modelling Group has a Net Asset of 172.37 M. This is much higher than that of the Software sector and significantly higher than that of the Information Technology industry. The net asset for all Canada stocks is notably lower than that of the firm.
Computer Net Asset Peer Comparison
Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Computer Modelling's direct or indirect competition against its Net Asset to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Computer Modelling could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Computer Modelling by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.Computer Modelling is currently under evaluation in net asset category among its peers.
Computer Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.13 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.20 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.19 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 926.21 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 81.85 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.03 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 56.90 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 916.77 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 17.37 X | ||||
| Price To Book | 13.42 X | ||||
| Price To Sales | 8.08 X | ||||
| Revenue | 108.68 M | ||||
| Gross Profit | 50.21 M | ||||
| EBITDA | 39.33 M | ||||
| Net Income | 26.26 M | ||||
| Cash And Equivalents | 51.2 M | ||||
| Cash Per Share | 0.64 X | ||||
| Total Debt | 36.96 M | ||||
| Debt To Equity | 1.11 % | ||||
| Current Ratio | 1.80 X | ||||
| Book Value Per Share | 0.87 X | ||||
| Cash Flow From Operations | 36.08 M | ||||
| Short Ratio | 8.59 X | ||||
| Earnings Per Share | 0.28 X | ||||
| Price To Earnings To Growth | (12.00) X | ||||
| Target Price | 14.71 | ||||
| Number Of Employees | 289 | ||||
| Beta | 1.21 | ||||
| Market Capitalization | 957.63 M | ||||
| Total Asset | 172.37 M | ||||
| Retained Earnings | (34.79 M) | ||||
| Working Capital | 41.77 M | ||||
| Current Asset | 98.17 M | ||||
| Current Liabilities | 41.96 M | ||||
| Annual Yield | 0.02 % | ||||
| Five Year Return | 5.09 % | ||||
| Net Asset | 172.37 M | ||||
| Last Dividend Paid | 0.2 |
About Computer Modelling Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Computer Modelling Group's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Computer Modelling using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Computer Modelling Group based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Computer Modelling
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Computer Modelling position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Computer Modelling will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Computer Stock
| 0.68 | FFH | Fairfax Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.47 | FFH-PC | Fairfax Fin Hld | PairCorr |
| 0.33 | FFH-PD | Fairfax Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.32 | ELF | E L Financial | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Computer Modelling could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Computer Modelling when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Computer Modelling - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Computer Modelling Group to buy it.
The correlation of Computer Modelling is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Computer Modelling moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Computer Modelling moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Computer Modelling can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Computer Stock
Computer Modelling financial ratios help investors to determine whether Computer Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Computer with respect to the benefits of owning Computer Modelling security.