Correlation Between Scientific Games and EHEALTH

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Scientific Games and EHEALTH at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Scientific Games and EHEALTH into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Scientific Games and EHEALTH, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Scientific Games and EHEALTH and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Scientific Games with a short position of EHEALTH. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Scientific Games and EHEALTH.

Diversification Opportunities for Scientific Games and EHEALTH

0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Scientific and EHEALTH is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Scientific Games and EHEALTH in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on EHEALTH and Scientific Games is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Scientific Games are associated (or correlated) with EHEALTH. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of EHEALTH has no effect on the direction of Scientific Games i.e., Scientific Games and EHEALTH go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Scientific Games and EHEALTH

Assuming the 90 days horizon Scientific Games is expected to generate 1.98 times less return on investment than EHEALTH. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Scientific Games is 2.42 times less risky than EHEALTH. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. EHEALTH is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  445.00  in EHEALTH on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  273.00  from holding EHEALTH or generate 61.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Scientific Games  vs.  EHEALTH

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Scientific Games 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Scientific Games has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.
EHEALTH 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in EHEALTH are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather fragile basic indicators, EHEALTH exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Scientific Games and EHEALTH Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Scientific Games and EHEALTH

The main advantage of trading using opposite Scientific Games and EHEALTH positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Scientific Games position performs unexpectedly, EHEALTH can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in EHEALTH will offset losses from the drop in EHEALTH's long position.
The idea behind Scientific Games and EHEALTH pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk