Correlation Between Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Rogers Communications with a short position of Goodfood Market. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market.

Diversification Opportunities for Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market

-0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Rogers and Goodfood is -0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goodfood Market Corp and Rogers Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Rogers Communications are associated (or correlated) with Goodfood Market. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goodfood Market Corp has no effect on the direction of Rogers Communications i.e., Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Rogers Communications is expected to under-perform the Goodfood Market. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Rogers Communications is 3.06 times less risky than Goodfood Market. The stock trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goodfood Market Corp is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  30.00  in Goodfood Market Corp on August 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.00  from holding Goodfood Market Corp or generate 16.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Rogers Communications  vs.  Goodfood Market Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Rogers Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Rogers Communications has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Rogers Communications is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Goodfood Market Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goodfood Market Corp are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Goodfood Market displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market

The main advantage of trading using opposite Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, Goodfood Market can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goodfood Market will offset losses from the drop in Goodfood Market's long position.
The idea behind Rogers Communications and Goodfood Market Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets