Correlation Between PING and Kava

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PING and Kava at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PING and Kava into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between PING and Kava, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PING and Kava and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PING with a short position of Kava. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PING and Kava.

Diversification Opportunities for PING and Kava

0.17

Correlation Coefficient

PING  Kava

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between PING and Kava is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PING and Kava in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kava and PING is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PING are associated (or correlated) with Kava. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kava has no effect on the direction of PING i.e., PING and Kava go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PING and Kava

If you would invest  33.00  in Kava on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  22.00  from holding Kava or generate 66.67% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	2.33%
Values	Daily Returns

PING  vs.  Kava

PING

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days PING has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, PING is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Kava

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kava are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Kava exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with PING and Kava

The main advantage of trading using opposite PING and Kava positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PING position performs unexpectedly, Kava can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kava will offset losses from the drop in Kava's long position.

The idea behind PING and Kava pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.