Correlation Between Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Minority Equality Opportunities and Oxbridge Acquisition Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Minority Equality with a short position of Oxbridge Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition

-0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Minority and Oxbridge is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Minority Equality Opportunitie and Oxbridge Acquisition Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oxbridge Acquisition and Minority Equality is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Minority Equality Opportunities are associated (or correlated) with Oxbridge Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oxbridge Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Minority Equality i.e., Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Minority Equality is expected to generate 1.49 times less return on investment than Oxbridge Acquisition. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Minority Equality Opportunities is 1.07 times less risky than Oxbridge Acquisition. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oxbridge Acquisition Equity is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.49  in Oxbridge Acquisition Equity on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.85  from holding Oxbridge Acquisition Equity or generate 114.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy69.12%
ValuesDaily Returns

Minority Equality Opportunitie  vs.  Oxbridge Acquisition Equity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Minority Equality 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Minority Equality Opportunities has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Minority Equality is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Oxbridge Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Oxbridge Acquisition Equity has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable fundamental indicators, Oxbridge Acquisition is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Minority Equality and Oxbridge Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Minority Equality position performs unexpectedly, Oxbridge Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oxbridge Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Oxbridge Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Minority Equality Opportunities and Oxbridge Acquisition Equity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk