Dine Total Stockholder Equity vs Long Term Debt Total Analysis
DIN Stock | USD 43.79 0.74 1.72% |
Dine Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just examining Dine Brands Global latest accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Dine Brands Global is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Dine Brands Total Stockholder Equity and its Long Term Debt Total accounts. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product.
Total Stockholder Equity vs Long Term Debt Total
Total Stockholder Equity vs Long Term Debt Total Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Dine Brands Global Total Stockholder Equity account and Long Term Debt Total. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have weak relationship.
The correlation between Dine Brands' Total Stockholder Equity and Long Term Debt Total is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Total Stockholder Equity that can explain the historical movement of Long Term Debt Total in the same time period over historical financial statements of Dine Brands Global, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Dine Brands' Total Stockholder Equity and Long Term Debt Total is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Total Stockholder Equity of Dine Brands Global are associated (or correlated) with its Long Term Debt Total. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Long Term Debt Total has no effect on the direction of Total Stockholder Equity i.e., Dine Brands' Total Stockholder Equity and Long Term Debt Total go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.37 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Very Weak |
Total Stockholder Equity
The total equity held by shareholders, calculated as the difference between a company's total assets and total liabilities. It represents the net value of the company owned by shareholders.Long Term Debt Total
Most indicators from Dine Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Dine Brands Global current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. As of the 12th of May 2024, Selling General Administrative is likely to drop to about 188.2 M. In addition to that, Tax Provision is likely to drop to about 20.9 M
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 375.2M | 377.4M | 388.4M | 263.5M | Total Revenue | 896.2M | 909.4M | 831.1M | 619.6M |
Dine Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Dine Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Dine Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 2.0B | 2.1B | 2.0B | 1.9B | 1.7B | 1.6B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 1.8B | 2.0B | 1.8B | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.0B | |
Other Current Liab | 220.4M | 209.5M | 264.8M | 80.1M | 214.9M | 225.6M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 357.9M | 348.6M | 410.7M | 470.7M | 460.5M | 483.5M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | (241.8M) | (354.7M) | (242.8M) | (301.1M) | (251.0M) | (238.4M) | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 583.4M | 534.1M | 514.8M | 434.4M | 437.1M | 353.5M | |
Net Debt | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 953.5M | |
Retained Earnings | 61.7M | (55.6M) | 35.4M | 84.5M | 150.0M | 180.7M | |
Accounts Payable | 40.9M | 37.4M | 56.0M | 52.1M | 36.2M | 33.8M | |
Cash | 116.0M | 383.4M | 361.4M | 269.7M | 181.1M | 190.1M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 1.7B | 1.5B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.3B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 200.3M | 153.1M | 119.2M | (74.6B) | (10.6M) | (11.2M) | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 116.0M | 383.4M | 361.4M | 269.7M | 181.1M | 92.3M | |
Net Receivables | 136.9M | 121.9M | 120.0M | 120.0M | 127.9M | 87.5M | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 17.2M | 16.2M | 16.9M | 15.9M | 15.2M | 15.1M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 2.0B | 2.1B | 2.0B | 1.9B | 1.7B | 1.6B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 1.9B | 2.1B | 1.8B | 1.7B | 1.5B | 1.3B | |
Inventory | 90.1M | 75.1M | 86.2M | 72.2M | 83.1M | 87.2M | |
Other Current Assets | 3.9M | 6.1M | 6.7M | 17.9M | 48.7M | 51.2M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (303.6M) | (299.3M) | (278.4M) | (385.8M) | (401.2M) | (381.1M) | |
Total Liab | 2.3B | 2.4B | 2.2B | 2.2B | 2.0B | 1.5B | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 583.3M | 534.1M | 514.8M | 434.4M | 763.0M | 801.2M | |
Total Current Assets | 346.9M | 586.5M | 574.4M | 479.8M | 357.8M | 247.2M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (58K) | (55K) | (59K) | (65K) | (64K) | (67.2K) | |
Short Term Debt | 86.5M | 94.0M | 82.8M | 166.6M | 170.7M | 179.3M | |
Intangible Assets | 575.1M | 549.7M | 539.4M | 597.0M | 586M | 408.4M | |
Other Liab | 171.0M | 142.1M | 139.4M | 136.1M | 156.5M | 141.2M | |
Other Assets | 200.3M | 576K | 29K | (39K) | (44.9K) | (42.6K) | |
Long Term Debt | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.3B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | |
Good Will | 345.3M | 343.9M | 251.6M | 254.0M | 254.1M | 418.2M | |
Treasury Stock | (450.6M) | (549.8M) | (556.9M) | (534.6M) | (481.1M) | (457.1M) | |
Property Plant Equipment | 216.4M | 534.1M | 514.8M | 434.4M | 391.0M | 319.4M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 10.1M | 7.7M | 7.2M | 172.0M | 38.7M | 36.7M | |
Net Tangible Assets | (1.2B) | (1.2B) | (1.0B) | (1.2B) | (1.3B) | (1.4B) | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 61.7M | (55.6M) | 35.4M | 84.5M | 76.1M | 112.4M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.3B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.1B | |
Capital Surpluse | 246.2M | 257.6M | 256.2M | 259.3M | 298.2M | 287.6M |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Dine Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Dine Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Dine Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Dine Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Dine Stock
0.59 | GENK | GEN Restaurant Group | PairCorr |
0.56 | KRUS | Kura Sushi USA Financial Report 4th of July 2024 | PairCorr |
0.48 | RAVE | Rave Restaurant Group | PairCorr |
0.45 | CMG | Chipotle Mexican Grill | PairCorr |
0.42 | DPZ | Dominos Pizza | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.
Complementary Tools for Dine Stock analysis
When running Dine Brands' price analysis, check to measure Dine Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Dine Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Dine Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Dine Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Dine Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Dine Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum |
Is Dine Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. If investors know Dine will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dine Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.35) | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 5.61 | Revenue Per Share 54.352 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of Dine Brands Global is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dine that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dine Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dine Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dine Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dine Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dine Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dine Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.