Mcdonalds Stock Z Score

MDO Stock  EUR 250.00  2.60  1.03%   
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in McDonalds. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
For more detail on how to invest in McDonalds Stock please use our How to Invest in McDonalds guide.
  

McDonalds Company Z Score Analysis

McDonalds' Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..

Z Score

 = 

Sum Of

5 Factors

More About Z Score | All Equity Analysis

Current McDonalds Z Score

    
  3.0  
Most of McDonalds' fundamental indicators, such as Z Score, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, McDonalds is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.

First Factor

 = 

1.2 * (

Working Capital

/

Total Assets )

Second Factor

 = 

1.4 * (

Retained Earnings

/

Total Assets )

Thrid Factor

 = 

3.3 * (

EBITAD

/

Total Assets )

Fouth Factor

 = 

0.6 * (

Market Value of Equity

/

Total Liabilities )

Fifth Factor

 = 

0.99 * (

Revenue

/

Total Assets )

To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
Competition

Based on the company's disclosures, McDonalds has a Z Score of 3.0. This is 7.12% lower than that of the Consumer Cyclical sector and 34.92% lower than that of the Restaurants industry. The z score for all Germany stocks is 65.6% higher than that of the company.

McDonalds Z Score Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses McDonalds' direct or indirect competition against its Z Score to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of McDonalds could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing McDonalds by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
McDonalds is currently under evaluation in z score category among related companies.

McDonalds Fundamentals

About McDonalds Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze McDonalds's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of McDonalds using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of McDonalds based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether McDonalds is a strong investment it is important to analyze McDonalds' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact McDonalds' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding McDonalds Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in McDonalds. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
For more detail on how to invest in McDonalds Stock please use our How to Invest in McDonalds guide.
You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Complementary Tools for McDonalds Stock analysis

When running McDonalds' price analysis, check to measure McDonalds' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy McDonalds is operating at the current time. Most of McDonalds' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of McDonalds' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move McDonalds' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of McDonalds to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Please note, there is a significant difference between McDonalds' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if McDonalds is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, McDonalds' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.