Correlation Between Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Loomis Sayles Inflation and Loomis Sayles Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Loomis Sayles with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Loomis and Loomis is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Loomis Sayles Inflation and Loomis Sayles Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Bond and Loomis Sayles is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Loomis Sayles Inflation are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Bond has no effect on the direction of Loomis Sayles i.e., Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon Loomis Sayles Inflation is expected to under-perform the Loomis Sayles. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Loomis Sayles Inflation is 1.15 times less risky than Loomis Sayles. The mutual fund trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Loomis Sayles Bond is currently generating about -0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,145  in Loomis Sayles Bond on February 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (8.00) from holding Loomis Sayles Bond or give up 0.7% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Loomis Sayles Inflation  vs.  Loomis Sayles Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Loomis Sayles Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Loomis Sayles Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Loomis Sayles Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Loomis Sayles Bond are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite Loomis Sayles and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Loomis Sayles position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind Loomis Sayles Inflation and Loomis Sayles Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated