Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Morgan Stanley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Morgan is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with Morgan Stanley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Morgan Stanley has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to generate 0.93 times more return on investment than Morgan Stanley. However, Goldman Sachs Group is 1.07 times less risky than Morgan Stanley. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Morgan Stanley is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  28,621  in Goldman Sachs Group on February 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15,188  from holding Goldman Sachs Group or generate 53.07% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  Morgan Stanley

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Morgan Stanley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in June 2024.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Morgan Stanley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Morgan Stanley will offset losses from the drop in Morgan Stanley's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume