Correlation Between Citigroup and Staffing 360

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Staffing 360 at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Staffing 360 into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Staffing 360 Solutions, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Staffing 360 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Staffing 360. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Staffing 360.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Staffing 360

-0.71
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Staffing is -0.71. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Staffing 360 Solutions in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Staffing 360 Solutions and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Staffing 360. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Staffing 360 Solutions has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Staffing 360 go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Staffing 360

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.33 times more return on investment than Staffing 360. However, Citigroup is 3.0 times less risky than Staffing 360. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Staffing 360 Solutions is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,908  in Citigroup on February 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,506  from holding Citigroup or generate 30.68% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Staffing 360 Solutions

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Staffing 360 Solutions 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Staffing 360 Solutions has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Citigroup and Staffing 360 Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Staffing 360

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Staffing 360 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Staffing 360 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Staffing 360 will offset losses from the drop in Staffing 360's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Staffing 360 Solutions pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing