Gregory Moskoff - FactSet Research Principal Accounting Officer, Controller

FDS Stock  USD 447.79  2.14  0.48%   

Executive

Gregory Moskoff is Principal Accounting Officer, Controller of FactSet Research Systems since 2019.
Age 53
Tenure 5 years
Address 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT, United States, 06850
Phone203 810 1000
Webhttps://www.factset.com

FactSet Research Management Efficiency

The company has Return on Asset of 0.1072 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.1072 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2871 %, implying that it generated $0.2871 on every 100 dollars invested. FactSet Research's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well FactSet Research manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.17 in 2024, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.29 in 2024. At this time, FactSet Research's Intangibles To Total Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.17 in 2024, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.29 in 2024.
The company has 1.84 B in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 1.67, which is OK given its current industry classification. FactSet Research Systems has a current ratio of 1.95, which is typical for the industry and considered as normal. Debt can assist FactSet Research until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, FactSet Research's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like FactSet Research Systems sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for FactSet to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about FactSet Research's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Showing other executives

EXECUTIVE Age

Elizabeth GischCME Group
54
Ato GarrettNasdaq Inc
N/A
Bryan SmithNasdaq Inc
51
Douglas FoleyIntercontinental Exchange
52
Roslynn WilliamsDun Bradstreet Holdings
48
Jana HainesMSCI Inc
N/A
Brian BuckleyNasdaq Inc
N/A
Peter ZangariMSCI Inc
56
Avinash GuptaDun Bradstreet Holdings
58
David GooneIntercontinental Exchange
63
Mary ONealIntercontinental Exchange
N/A
Michel EveraertCME Group
56
Richard SteeleMoodys
N/A
Andrew WeinbergMoodys
N/A
Jason WellerCME Group
63
Edward GogolCME Group
70
Jonathan MarcusCME Group
N/A
Katia GonzalezIntercontinental Exchange
N/A
James NamkungIntercontinental Exchange
48
Rich KulesaDun Bradstreet Holdings
N/A
Scott MinterMoodys
N/A
FactSet Research Systems Inc., a financial data and analytics company, provides integrated financial information and analytical applications to the investment community in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. FactSet Research Systems Inc. was founded in 1978 and is headquartered in Norwalk, Connecticut. Factset Research operates under Financial Data Stock Exchanges classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 11203 people. FactSet Research Systems (FDS) is traded on New York Stock Exchange in USA. It is located in 45 Glover Avenue, Norwalk, CT, United States, 06850 and employs 12,279 people. FactSet Research is listed under Financial Exchanges & Data category by Fama And French industry classification.

Management Performance

FactSet Research Systems Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the FactSet Research's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: FactSet Research inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of FactSet. The board's role is to monitor FactSet Research's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. FactSet Research's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, FactSet Research's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Malcolm Frank, Independent Director
Maria Tejada, Director
Sheila Jordan, Independent Director
Frederick Snow, CEO Director
Gregory Moskoff, Principal Accounting Officer, Controller
Goran Skoko, Executive Vice President, Managing Director EMEA and Asia Pacific, Head of Research & Advisory Solutions
Alexandra Nes, Senior Relations
Kendra Brown, Head Relations
Katherine Stepp, Executive CTO
Robert Robie, the Executive Vice President Head of Analytics and Trading Analytics Solutions
F Snow, Chief Executive Officer, Director
Robin Abrams, Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board
Daniel Viens, Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President
Gene Fernandez, Executive Vice President, Chief Technology and Product Officer
James McGonigle, Lead Independent Director
Rachel Stern, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Global Head of Strategic Resources and Secretary
Laurie Siegel, Independent Director
Catrina Harding, Executive Officer
Lee Shavel, Independent Director
Jonathan Reeve, Executive Vice President Head of Content & Technology Solutions
Helen Shan, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
Siew Choy, Independent Director
Linda Huber, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
Scott Billeadeau, Independent Director
Joseph Zimmel, Independent Director
Kristina Karnovsky, Executive Vice President Chief Product Officer

FactSet Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is FactSet Research a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Pair Trading with FactSet Research

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if FactSet Research position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FactSet Research will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving together with FactSet Stock

  0.63VALU Value Line Normal TradingPairCorr
  0.72CME CME GroupPairCorr
  0.67ICE Intercontinental ExchangePairCorr

Moving against FactSet Stock

  0.61DB Deutsche Bank AGPairCorr
  0.54DIST Distoken AcquisitionPairCorr
  0.51C Citigroup Financial Report 12th of July 2024 PairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to FactSet Research could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace FactSet Research when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back FactSet Research - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling FactSet Research Systems to buy it.
The correlation of FactSet Research is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as FactSet Research moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if FactSet Research Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for FactSet Research can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether FactSet Research Systems is a strong investment it is important to analyze FactSet Research's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact FactSet Research's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding FactSet Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in FactSet Research Systems. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in unemployment.
Note that the FactSet Research Systems information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other FactSet Research's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Complementary Tools for FactSet Stock analysis

When running FactSet Research's price analysis, check to measure FactSet Research's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy FactSet Research is operating at the current time. Most of FactSet Research's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of FactSet Research's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move FactSet Research's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of FactSet Research to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Is FactSet Research's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of FactSet Research. If investors know FactSet will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about FactSet Research listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.08
Dividend Share
3.92
Earnings Share
12.63
Revenue Per Share
56.495
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.06
The market value of FactSet Research Systems is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of FactSet that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of FactSet Research's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is FactSet Research's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because FactSet Research's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect FactSet Research's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between FactSet Research's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if FactSet Research is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, FactSet Research's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.