Ray Rothrock - Check Point Independent Outside Director
| CHKP Stock | USD 149.47 0.50 0.34% |
Director
Mr. Ray A. Rothrock serves as Independent Outside Director of Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. He has served on our board of directors since 1995. Mr. Rothrock has also served as one of our outside directors under the Israeli Companies Law since 2000. Mr. Rothrock is a Partner emeritus at Venrock, a VC firm, where he was a member since 1988 and a general partner since 1995. He retired from Venrock in 2013. Presently, Mr. Rothrock is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of RedSeal, Inc., a cybersecurity analytics company. Mr. Rothrock is also a director of a number of private companies. Mr. Rothrock is a member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Corporationrationration, and a Trustee of the University of Texas and Texas AM Investment Management Company since 2000.
| Age | 62 |
| Tenure | 24 years |
| Professional Marks | MBA |
| Address | 5 Shlomo Kaplan Street, Tel Aviv, Israel, 6789159 |
| Phone | 972 3 753 4599 |
| Web | https://www.checkpoint.com |
Check Point Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.101 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.101 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.298 %, meaning that it created $0.298 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Check Point's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Check Point manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Check Point's Return On Capital Employed is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 05/02/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.19, while Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.21. At this time, Check Point's Total Current Liabilities is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 05/02/2024, Non Current Liabilities Total is likely to grow to about 1 B, while Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to drop slightly above 3.6 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| William Wagner | Akamai Technologies | 51 | |
| Nikhil Mehta | F5 Networks | 40 | |
| Monte Ford | Akamai Technologies | 58 | |
| Jeffrey Horing | WixCom | 52 | |
| Kimberly Hammonds | Tenable Holdings | 51 | |
| Kristi Rogers | Qualys Inc | 48 | |
| Herald Chen | Godaddy | 50 | |
| Frank Sica | CSG Systems International | 67 | |
| Sandra Bergeron | Qualys Inc | 59 | |
| Marie Myers | F5 Networks | 49 | |
| Mark Garrett | Godaddy | 62 | |
| Pamela Craig | Akamai Technologies | 61 | |
| Louis Simpson | VeriSign | 81 | |
| Howard Schmidt | Qualys Inc | 65 | |
| John Hughes | CSG Systems International | 64 | |
| Benjamin Horowitz | Okta Inc | 50 | |
| Ron Cooper | CSG Systems International | 60 | |
| Bernardus Verwaayen | Akamai Technologies | 66 | |
| Caroline Donahue | Godaddy | 59 | |
| Michael McConnell | SPS Commerce | 52 | |
| Marty Reaume | SPS Commerce | 52 | |
Management Performance
Check Point Software Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Check Point's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Check Point inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Check. The board's role is to monitor Check Point's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Check Point's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Check Point's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Tal Shavit, Independent Director | ||
| Amnon BarLev, President | ||
| Peter Alexander, Chief Officer | ||
| Tal Payne, Chief Officer | ||
| Alex Spokoiny, Chief Officer | ||
| Yiftah Yoffe, Chief Officer | ||
| Guy Gecht, Independent Outside Director | ||
| Chris Scanlan, Pres Sales | ||
| Roei Golan, Chief Officer | ||
| Sharon Schusheim, Chief Officer | ||
| Gil Shwed, Co-Founder, CEO and Executive Director | ||
| Jerry Ungerman, Vice Chairman of the Board | ||
| Sundar Balasubramanian, Managing Region | ||
| Marius Nacht, Co-Founder and Non-Executive Chairman | ||
| Ray Rothrock, Independent Outside Director | ||
| David Rubner, Independent Director | ||
| Dan Propper, Independent Director | ||
| Shai Weiss, Director | ||
| Manish Alshi, Head India | ||
| Dorit Dor, VP of Products | ||
| Julie Parrish, Chief Marketing Officer | ||
| Irwin Federman, Independent Outside Director | ||
| Yoav Chelouche, Independent Outside Director | ||
| Shira Yashar, General Counsel | ||
| Erez Yarkoni, Head Sales | ||
| Kip Meintzer, IR Contact Officer | ||
| Nataly Kremer, Chief RD | ||
| Itai Greenberg, Chief Business | ||
| Dan Yerushalmi, Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Rupal Hollenbeck, President |
Check Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Check Point a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.3 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.1 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.34 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.32 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 15.21 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 112.91 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 22.00 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 74.55 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 3.01 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 21.80 X |
Pair Trading with Check Point
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Check Point position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Check Point will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Check Point could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Check Point when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Check Point - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Check Point Software to buy it.
The correlation of Check Point is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Check Point moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Check Point Software moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Check Point can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Check Point Software. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in industry. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.
Complementary Tools for Check Stock analysis
When running Check Point's price analysis, check to measure Check Point's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Check Point is operating at the current time. Most of Check Point's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Check Point's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Check Point's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Check Point to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets |
Is Check Point's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Check Point. If investors know Check will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Check Point listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.053 | Earnings Share 7.18 | Revenue Per Share 21.274 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.058 | Return On Assets 0.101 |
The market value of Check Point Software is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Check that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Check Point's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Check Point's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Check Point's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Check Point's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Check Point's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Check Point is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Check Point's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.