Jill Granat - Restaurant Brands General Counsel, Corporate Secretary

0R6 Stock  EUR 65.50  0.28  0.43%   

Executive

Ms. Jill M. Granat is General Counsel, Corporationrationrate Secretary of Restaurant Brands International Inc. Ms. Granat was appointed General Counsel and Corporationrationrate Secretary in December 2014. Ms. Granat served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Burger King Worldwide and its predecessor since February 2011. Prior to this time, Ms. Granat was Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Burger King Corporation from July 2009 until March 2011. Ms. Granat joined Burger King Corporation in 1998 as a member of the legal department and served in positions of increasing responsibility with Burger King Corporationrationration. since 2014.
Age 57
Tenure 10 years
Phone905 339 6011
Webhttps://www.rbi.com

Jill Granat Latest Insider Activity

Tracking and analyzing the buying and selling activities of Jill Granat against Restaurant Brands stock is an integral part of due diligence when investing in Restaurant Brands. Jill Granat insider activity provides valuable insight into whether Restaurant Brands is net buyers or sellers over its current business cycle. Note, Restaurant Brands insiders must abide by specific rules, including filing SEC forms every time they buy or sell Restaurant Brands'shares to prevent insider trading or benefiting illegally from material non-public information that their positions give them access to.

Restaurant Brands Management Efficiency

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.055 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.055 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.365 %, meaning that it generated $0.365 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has accumulated 12.84 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 355.4, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. Restaurant Brands has a current ratio of 1.08, suggesting that it is in a questionable position to pay out its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Restaurant Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Restaurant Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Restaurant Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Restaurant to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Restaurant Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Similar Executives

Found 1 records

EXECUTIVE Age

Darren HribarSuperior Plus Corp
N/A
Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates, and franchises quick service restaurants under the Tim Hortons , Burger King , and Popeyes brand names. Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. RESTAURANT BRANDS operates under Restaurants classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 6000 people. Restaurant Brands International (0R6) is traded on Frankfurt Exchange in Germany and employs 6,400 people.

Management Performance

Restaurant Brands Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Restaurant Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Restaurant Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Restaurant. The board's role is to monitor Restaurant Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Restaurant Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Restaurant Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Jill Granat, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary
Jeff Housman, Chief Officer
Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Officer
David Shear, Pres International
Thomas Curtis, Pres Canada
Stephen Lichtner, Director Relations
Jacqueline Friesner, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller
Jose Cil, President - Burger King
Patrick Doyle, Ex Chairman
Joshua Kobza, Chief Officer

Restaurant Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Restaurant Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Restaurant Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze Restaurant Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Restaurant Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.
You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Complementary Tools for Restaurant Stock analysis

When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Please note, there is a significant difference between Restaurant Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Restaurant Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Restaurant Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.