Airbus Group Current Debt
| AIR Stock | EUR 150.30 2.80 1.83% |
Airbus Group SE has over 11.6 Billion in debt which may indicate that it relies heavily on debt financing. With a high degree of financial leverage come high-interest payments, which usually reduce Airbus Group's Earnings Per Share (EPS).
Asset vs Debt
Equity vs Debt
Airbus Group's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Airbus Group's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Airbus Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Airbus Group's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Airbus Group, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Airbus Group SE, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Airbus Group's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Given that Airbus Group's debt-to-equity ratio measures a Company's obligations relative to the value of its net assets, it is usually used by traders to estimate the extent to which Airbus Group is acquiring new debt as a mechanism of leveraging its assets. A high debt-to-equity ratio is generally associated with increased risk, implying that it has been aggressive in financing its growth with debt. Another way to look at debt-to-equity ratios is to compare the overall debt load of Airbus Group to its assets or equity, showing how much of the company assets belong to shareholders vs. creditors. If shareholders own more assets, Airbus Group is said to be less leveraged. If creditors hold a majority of Airbus Group's assets, the Company is said to be highly leveraged.
Airbus |
Airbus Group SE Debt to Cash Allocation
Airbus Group SE has accumulated 11.6 B in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 123.6, indicating the company may have difficulties to generate enough cash to satisfy its financial obligations. Airbus Group SE has a current ratio of 0.94, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Airbus Group until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Airbus Group's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Airbus Group SE sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Airbus to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Airbus Group's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.Airbus Group Assets Financed by Debt
Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Airbus Group's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Airbus Group, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.Understaning Airbus Group Use of Financial Leverage
Airbus Group financial leverage ratio helps in determining the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Airbus Group's total debt position, including all of outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with the equity. In simple terms, the high financial leverage means the cost of production, together with running the business day-to-day, is high, whereas, lower financial leverage implies lower fixed cost investment in the business and generally considered by investors to be a good sign. So if creditors own a majority of Airbus Group assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of overall Airbus Group debt and outstanding corporate bonds gives a good idea of how risky the capital structure of a business and if it is worth investing in it. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Airbus Group's owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if the firm cannot cover its debt costs. The degree of Airbus Group's financial leverage can be measured in several ways, including by ratios such as the debt-to-equity ratio (total debt / total equity), equity multiplier (total assets / total equity), or the debt ratio (total debt / total assets).
Airbus SE provides aerospace products, services, and solutions in the Netherlands and internationally. Airbus SE was founded in 2000 and is based in Leiden, the Netherlands. AIRBUS is traded on Madrid SE C.A.T.S. in Spain. Please read more on our technical analysis page.
Also Currently Popular
Analyzing currently trending equities could be an opportunity to develop a better portfolio based on different market momentums that they can trigger. Utilizing the top trending stocks is also useful when creating a market-neutral strategy or pair trading technique involving a short or a long position in a currently trending equity.Other Information on Investing in Airbus Stock
Airbus Group financial ratios help investors to determine whether Airbus Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Airbus with respect to the benefits of owning Airbus Group security.
What is Financial Leverage?
Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.Leverage and Capital Costs
The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.Benefits of Financial Leverage
Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:- Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
- It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
- Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.