Procter Gamble Stock Piotroski F Score

PG Stock  USD 157.29  1.34  0.86%   
This module uses fundamental data of Procter Gamble to approximate its Piotroski F score. Procter Gamble F Score is determined by combining nine binary scores representing 3 distinct fundamental categories of Procter Gamble. These three categories are profitability, efficiency, and funding. Some research analysts and sophisticated value traders use Piotroski F Score to find opportunities outside of the conventional market and financial statement analysis.They believe that some of the new information about Procter Gamble financial position does not get reflected in the current market share price suggesting a possibility of arbitrage. Check out Procter Gamble Altman Z Score, Procter Gamble Correlation, Procter Gamble Valuation, as well as analyze Procter Gamble Alpha and Beta and Procter Gamble Hype Analysis.
For more detail on how to invest in Procter Stock please use our How to Invest in Procter Gamble guide.
  
At this time, Procter Gamble's Interest Debt Per Share is most likely to slightly grow in the upcoming years. At this time, Procter Gamble's Free Cash Flow Yield is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Procter Gamble's current Operating Cash Flow Per Share is estimated to increase to 6.72, while PTB Ratio is projected to decrease to 3.80.
At this time, it appears that Procter Gamble's Piotroski F Score is Healthy. Although some professional money managers and academia have recently criticized Piotroski F-Score model, we still consider it an effective method of predicting the state of the financial strength of any organization that is not predisposed to accounting gimmicks and manipulations. Using this score on the criteria to originate an efficient long-term portfolio can help investors filter out the purely speculative stocks or equities playing fundamental games by manipulating their earnings..
6.0
Piotroski F Score - Healthy
Current Return On Assets

Positive

Focus
Change in Return on Assets

Decreased

Focus
Cash Flow Return on Assets

Positive

Focus
Current Quality of Earnings (accrual)

Improving

Focus
Asset Turnover Growth

Increase

Focus
Current Ratio Change

Increase

Focus
Long Term Debt Over Assets Change

Lower Leverage

Focus
Change In Outstending Shares

Increase

Focus
Change in Gross Margin

No Change

Focus

Procter Gamble Piotroski F Score Drivers

The critical factor to consider when applying the Piotroski F Score to Procter Gamble is to make sure Procter is not a subject of accounting manipulations and runs a healthy internal audit department. So, if Procter Gamble's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back. Below are the main accounts that are used in the Piotroski F Score model. By analyzing the historical trends of the mains drivers, investors can determine if Procter Gamble's financial numbers are properly reported.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Return On Assets0.07060.11
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Asset Turnover0.990.78
Significantly Up
Very volatile
Gross Profit Margin0.380.43
Fairly Down
Pretty Stable
Net Debt17.6 B30.3 B
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Liabilities21 B41.1 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Non Current Liabilities Total26.5 B43.7 B
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Total Assets84.3 B139 B
Way Down
Pretty Stable
Total Current Assets18.9 B26 B
Way Down
Very volatile
Total Cash From Operating Activities11.4 B19.4 B
Way Down
Slightly volatile

Procter Gamble F Score Driver Matrix

One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to project the various growth rates. Understanding the correlation between Procter Gamble's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Procter Gamble in a much-optimized way.

About Procter Gamble Piotroski F Score

F-Score is one of many stock grading techniques developed by Joseph Piotroski, a professor of accounting at the Stanford University Graduate School of Business. It was published in 2002 under the paper titled Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers. Piotroski F Score is based on binary analysis strategy in which stocks are given one point for passing 9 very simple fundamental tests, and zero point otherwise. According to Mr. Piotroski's analysis, his F-Score binary model can help to predict the performance of low price-to-book stocks.

Pretax Profit Margin

0.12

At this time, Procter Gamble's Pretax Profit Margin is most likely to increase slightly in the upcoming years.

Procter Gamble ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Procter Gamble's sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Procter Gamble's managers, analysts, and investors.
Environment Score
Governance Score
Social Score

About Procter Gamble Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Procter Gamble's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Procter Gamble using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Procter Gamble based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Becoming a Better Investor with Macroaxis

Macroaxis puts the power of mathematics on your side. We analyze your portfolios and positions such as Procter Gamble using complex mathematical models and algorithms, but make them easy to understand. There is no real person involved in your portfolio analysis. We perform a number of calculations to compute absolute and relative portfolio volatility, correlation between your assets, value at risk, expected return as well as over 100 different fundamental and technical indicators.

Build Optimal Portfolios

Align your risk with return expectations

Fix your portfolio
By capturing your risk tolerance and investment horizon Macroaxis technology of instant portfolio optimization will compute exactly how much risk is acceptable for your desired return expectations
When determining whether Procter Gamble is a strong investment it is important to analyze Procter Gamble's competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Procter Gamble's future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Procter Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Procter Gamble Altman Z Score, Procter Gamble Correlation, Procter Gamble Valuation, as well as analyze Procter Gamble Alpha and Beta and Procter Gamble Hype Analysis.
For more detail on how to invest in Procter Stock please use our How to Invest in Procter Gamble guide.
Note that the Procter Gamble information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Procter Gamble's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Complementary Tools for Procter Stock analysis

When running Procter Gamble's price analysis, check to measure Procter Gamble's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Procter Gamble is operating at the current time. Most of Procter Gamble's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Procter Gamble's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Procter Gamble's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Procter Gamble to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Is Procter Gamble's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Procter Gamble. If investors know Procter will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Procter Gamble listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
(0.11)
Dividend Share
3.735
Earnings Share
5.96
Revenue Per Share
35.567
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.032
The market value of Procter Gamble is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Procter that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Procter Gamble's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Procter Gamble's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Procter Gamble's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Procter Gamble's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Procter Gamble's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Procter Gamble is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Procter Gamble's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.