Correlation Between Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Constellation Brands Class and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Constellation Brands with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble

0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Constellation and Procter is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Constellation Brands Class and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Constellation Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Constellation Brands Class are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Constellation Brands i.e., Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Constellation Brands Class is expected to under-perform the Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Constellation Brands is 1.92 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about -0.15 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.52 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  15,504  in Procter Gamble on February 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  942.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 6.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Constellation Brands Class  vs.  Procter Gamble

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Constellation Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Constellation Brands Class are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Constellation Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Constellation Brands and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Constellation Brands position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Constellation Brands Class and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope