Correlation Between Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Marsh McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Marsh McLennan with a short position of Erie Indemnity. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity.

Diversification Opportunities for Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity

0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Marsh and Erie is 0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marsh McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Erie Indemnity and Marsh McLennan is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Marsh McLennan Companies are associated (or correlated) with Erie Indemnity. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Erie Indemnity has no effect on the direction of Marsh McLennan i.e., Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Marsh McLennan is expected to generate 7.21 times less return on investment than Erie Indemnity. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Marsh McLennan Companies is 2.08 times less risky than Erie Indemnity. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Erie Indemnity is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  21,653  in Erie Indemnity on January 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  16,568  from holding Erie Indemnity or generate 76.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Marsh McLennan Companies  vs.  Erie Indemnity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Marsh McLennan Companies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Marsh McLennan Companies are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound primary indicators, Marsh McLennan is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Erie Indemnity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Erie Indemnity are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather conflicting forward indicators, Erie Indemnity exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity

The main advantage of trading using opposite Marsh McLennan and Erie Indemnity positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Marsh McLennan position performs unexpectedly, Erie Indemnity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Erie Indemnity will offset losses from the drop in Erie Indemnity's long position.
The idea behind Marsh McLennan Companies and Erie Indemnity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes