Intel Company Insiders
| INTC Stock | USD 35.04 0.64 1.79% |
About 55% of Intel's shareholders are presently acquiring. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Intel stock suggests that some insiders are bullish at this time. Intel employs about 124.8 K people. The company is managed by 60 executives with a total tenure of roughly 389 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 2080.0 employees per reported executive.
| Brian Krzanich CEO CEO, Director and Member of Executive Committee |
| Andrew Bryant Chairman Chairman of the Board |
Intel's Insider Buying Vs Selling
55
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-02-01 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 2800 @ 42.74 | View | ||
| 2024-01-29 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 3000 @ 43.36 | View | ||
| 2024-01-24 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 49.09 | |||
| 2024-01-08 | Jonathan L. Jackson | Acquired @ 48.45 | |||
| 2023-12-14 | Jerry Moran | Disposed @ 45.18 | |||
| 2023-11-22 | J. French Hill | Acquired @ 43.67 | |||
| 2023-11-01 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 6775 @ 36.8 | View | ||
| 2023-10-24 | Greg Stanton | Disposed @ 34.59 | |||
| 2023-09-26 | Greg Stanton | Acquired @ 33.83 | |||
| 2023-09-20 | Sheldon Whitehouse | Disposed @ 34.69 | |||
| 2023-09-13 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 38.71 | |||
| 2023-08-21 | Michelle Johnston Holthaus | Disposed 1 @ 32.41 | View | ||
| 2023-08-18 | Tommy Tuberville | Acquired @ 32.75 | |||
| 2023-08-02 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 3850 @ 34.63 | View | ||
| 2023-07-31 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 3250 @ 35.87 | View | ||
| 2023-06-12 | Corp Intel | Disposed 38500000 @ 40.84 | View | ||
| 2023-05-10 | John W. Hickenlooper | Disposed @ 29.97 | |||
| 2023-05-01 | Patrick P Gelsinger | Acquired 8200 @ 30.41 | View |
Monitoring Intel's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Intel's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Intel. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Intel's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
Intel |
Intel's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Intel's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Intel will maintain a workforce of about 124800 employees by May 2024.Intel's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Intel, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Intel by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2024-01-08 | Representative Jonathan Jackson | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2023-11-22 | Representative James French Hill | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-09-26 | Representative Greg Stanton | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-09-20 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2023-05-10 | Senator John W Hickenlooper | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
| 2022-12-15 | Representative Earl Blumenauer | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2022-10-17 | Senator Thomas R. Carper | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2022-06-17 | Senator Shelley Moore Capito | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-09-16 | Representative Katherine M. Clark | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2021-04-06 | Senator Ron Wyden | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2021-02-16 | Representative Peter Meijer | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2020-12-22 | Representative Gilbert Cisneros | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-12-18 | Representative Dean Phillips | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-09-02 | Representative Roger W. Marshall | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-08-21 | Senator Jerry Moran | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-16 | Senator David A Perdue , Jr | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2019-02-28 | Senator Jack Reed | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2018-01-26 | Senator Shelley M Capito | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2017-09-15 | Senator Tammy Duckworth | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2016-01-05 | Senator Bill Cassidy | Acquired Under $15K | Verify |
Intel Management Team Effectiveness
As of April 19, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.05. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.02. At present, Intel's Non Current Assets Total are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to grow to about 8.6 B, whereas Other Current Assets are forecasted to decline to about 2.3 B. Intel's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Intel manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.The current year's Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to grow to about 11.4 B, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is forecasted to decline to about 3.9 B.
Intel Workforce Comparison
Intel is currently regarded as number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 131,803. Intel totals roughly 124,800 in number of employees claiming about 95% of equities under Information Technology industry.
Intel Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.03 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.09 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.09.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.45 | 0.38 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.11 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.0317 | 0.0333 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.2 | 0.11 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0481 | 0.0506 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.0676 | 0.0711 |
|
|
Intel Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Intel insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Intel's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Intel insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-01 | 0.6957 | 16 | 23 | 145,588 | 180,683 |
| 2023-12-01 | 1.1071 | 31 | 28 | 231,311 | 259,958 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.6897 | 20 | 29 | 129,985 | 177,493 |
| 2023-06-01 | 1.6471 | 56 | 34 | 2,479,152 | 189,343 |
| 2023-03-01 | 0.8857 | 31 | 35 | 231,493 | 258,518 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.7143 | 25 | 35 | 304,867 | 498,961 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 112,047 | 107,041 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.8 | 24 | 30 | 129,015 | 529,808 |
| 2022-03-01 | 0.8409 | 37 | 44 | 171,197,953 | 345,575,229 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.8636 | 38 | 44 | 202,372 | 152,465 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.463 | 25 | 54 | 9,761,105 | 19,794,134 |
| 2021-06-01 | 0.7778 | 42 | 54 | 180,823 | 219,503 |
| 2021-03-01 | 1.0833 | 52 | 48 | 7,688,583 | 157,913 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.5926 | 32 | 54 | 88,871 | 3,904,259 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.5263 | 30 | 57 | 80,924 | 116,665 |
| 2020-06-01 | 0.6104 | 47 | 77 | 142,690 | 272,210 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.7328 | 85 | 116 | 1,588,111 | 1,149,997 |
| 2019-12-01 | 0.5325 | 41 | 77 | 411,242 | 411,138 |
| 2019-09-01 | 0.5538 | 36 | 65 | 117,314 | 471,604 |
| 2019-06-01 | 0.7705 | 47 | 61 | 1,082,427 | 240,977 |
| 2019-03-01 | 0.954 | 83 | 87 | 5,309,677 | 570,643 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.6491 | 37 | 57 | 207,574 | 314,149 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.6607 | 37 | 56 | 178,913 | 157,673 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.5625 | 36 | 64 | 129,567 | 294,447 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.902 | 92 | 102 | 1,260,777 | 634,530 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.5342 | 39 | 73 | 1,542,003 | 2,473,549 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.5625 | 36 | 64 | 183,555 | 361,402 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.6458 | 31 | 48 | 142,220 | 251,467 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.9625 | 77 | 80 | 2,272,855 | 1,577,330 |
| 2016-12-01 | 0.5 | 16 | 32 | 484,717 | 366,903 |
| 2016-09-01 | 1.1 | 11 | 10 | 23,581 | 20,532 |
| 2016-03-01 | 3.0 | 9 | 3 | 22,497 | 2,997 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.9375 | 15 | 16 | 126,529 | 129,836 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 15,645 | 69,729 |
| 2014-09-01 | 1.3846 | 18 | 13 | 36,519 | 42,833 |
| 2013-09-01 | 1.6154 | 21 | 13 | 71,679 | 29,540 |
| 2013-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 57,738 | 87,867 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 399,954 | 464,530 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 20,239 | 179,688 |
| 2012-09-01 | 1.2105 | 23 | 19 | 92,652 | 74,164 |
| 2012-06-01 | 0.5882 | 10 | 17 | 2,499,013 | 4,508,521 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.75 | 6 | 8 | 734,279 | 94,220 |
| 2011-12-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 225,908 | 453,500 |
| 2011-09-01 | 1.6 | 24 | 15 | 77,919 | 57,126 |
| 2011-06-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 39,658 | 58,444 |
| 2010-09-01 | 1.8 | 18 | 10 | 101,046 | 18,966 |
| 2010-06-01 | 0.5 | 6 | 12 | 55,750 | 80,421 |
| 2009-12-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 263,015 | 598,182 |
| 2009-09-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 46,751 | 21,881 |
| 2009-06-01 | 0.72 | 18 | 25 | 887,935 | 95,312 |
| 2008-12-01 | 1.0 | 22 | 22 | 375,604 | 367,517 |
| 2008-09-01 | 1.2 | 12 | 10 | 35,229 | 328,454 |
| 2008-06-01 | 1.7 | 34 | 20 | 1,419,890 | 465,559 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 202,250 | 256,000 |
| 2007-12-01 | 0.1125 | 9 | 80 | 2,208,402 | 3,981,598 |
| 2007-09-01 | 2.0 | 12 | 6 | 27,507 | 579,291 |
| 2007-06-01 | 0.5439 | 31 | 57 | 1,441,890 | 951,512 |
| 2007-03-01 | 1.5 | 6 | 4 | 826,750 | 104,000 |
| 2006-09-01 | 4.0 | 12 | 3 | 2,287,660 | 2,260,500 |
| 2006-06-01 | 13.0 | 26 | 2 | 984,062 | 79,000 |
| 2006-03-01 | 0.1852 | 5 | 27 | 678,500 | 1,152,000 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 40,000 | 259,571 |
| 2005-09-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 68,500 | 0.00 |
| 2005-06-01 | 10.5 | 21 | 2 | 1,025,500 | 21,400 |
| 2005-03-01 | 0.7692 | 10 | 13 | 1,416,000 | 2,904,000 |
| 2004-12-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 769,261 | 2,231,593 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 1,885 | 44,400 |
| 2004-06-01 | 9.6667 | 29 | 3 | 1,136,143 | 128,820 |
| 2004-03-01 | 0.5 | 9 | 18 | 685,960 | 1,098,618 |
| 2003-12-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 171,546 | 430,000 |
| 2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 260,845 | 17,760 |
| 2003-03-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 1,101 | 7,103 |
| 2000-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 100.00 | 700.00 |
Intel Notable Stakeholders
An Intel stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Intel often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Intel's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Intel's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Brian Krzanich | CEO, Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
| Andrew Bryant | Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Matthew Smith | Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Michelle Holthaus | Senior Vice President and General Manager - Sales and Marketing Group, Interim Chief Marketing Officer | Profile | |
| Allon Stabinsky | Senior Vice President and Chief Deputy General Counsel, Law and Policy Group | Profile | |
| Leslie Culbertson | Senior Vice President of Human Resources | Profile | |
| Paul Vaccaro | Senior Vice President - Operations and Engineering | Profile | |
| Michael Mayberry | Senior Vice President CTO | Profile | |
| Daniel McNamara | Senior Vice President and General Manager - Programmable Solutions Group | Profile | |
| Ann Kelleher | Senior Vice President - Technology and Manufacturing | Profile | |
| George Davis | CFO, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Navin Shenoy | Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Gregory Bryant | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Venkata Renduchintala | Executive VP and Presidentident - Client and Internet of Things (IoT) Businesses and Systems Architecture Group | Profile | |
| Sandra Rivera | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
| Gregory Pearson | Senior Vice President General Manager - Sales and Marketing Group | Profile | |
| Steven Rodgers | Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Robert Swan | CFO, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| David Zinsner | Executive CFO | Profile | |
| Todd Underwood | Interim CFO | Profile | |
| Greg Lavender | Executive CTO | Profile | |
| William Holt | Executive VP and General Manager of Technology and Manufacturing Group | Profile | |
| Robert Stein | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrew Wilson | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Stacy Smith | CFO, Executive VP and Director of Corporate Strategy | Profile | |
| Susan Decker | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| TsuJae Liu | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Charlene Barshefsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Pottruck | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Gregory Smith | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Aneel Bhusri | Director | Profile | |
| Risa LavizzoMourey | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Reed Hundt | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Frank Yeary | Independent Director | Profile | |
| John Donahoe | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Plummer | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Omar Ishrak | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Yoffie | Independent Director | Profile | |
| James Carwana | VP Sports | Profile | |
| Keyvan Esfarjani | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Shlomit Weiss | Senior Group | Profile | |
| Patrick Gelsinger | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Daniel Rodriguez | Corporate Group | Profile | |
| Kevin McBride | Principal Accounting Officer | Profile | |
| Steve Scargall | Persistent Architect | Profile | |
| Safroadu YeboahAmankwah | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Jo Levy | Chief Group | Profile | |
| John Pitzer | Corporate Relations | Profile | |
| April Boise | Ex Officer | Profile | |
| Renee James | President | Profile | |
| Dawn Jones | Chief Impact | Profile | |
| Scott Gawel | Corporate Officer | Profile | |
| Sailesh Kottapalli | Platform Fellow | Profile | |
| Aicha Evans | Chief Strategy Officer | Profile | |
| Navid Shahriari | Senior Group | Profile | |
| Lisa Pearce | Graphics Architecture | Profile | |
| Frans Scheper | Middle Europe | Profile | |
| Shesha Krishnapura | Fellow Officer | Profile | |
| Christoph Schell | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Szymon Romik | Software Engineer | Profile |
About Intel Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Intel often depends on how effective the management is. Intel management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Intel management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Intel management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 |
The data published in Intel's official financial statements usually reflect Intel's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Intel. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Intel accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Intel's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Intel's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Intel's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Intel's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Intel. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Intel's management manipulating its earnings.
Intel Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Intel use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Intel within its industry.Intel Manpower Efficiency
Return on Intel Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 434.5K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 903.8M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 13.4K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 27.9M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 121.9K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 253.6M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Intel. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in estimate. For information on how to trade Intel Stock refer to our How to Trade Intel Stock guide.You can also try the AI Investment Finder module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.
Complementary Tools for Intel Stock analysis
When running Intel's price analysis, check to measure Intel's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Intel is operating at the current time. Most of Intel's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Intel's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Intel's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Intel to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
| Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators |
Is Intel's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Intel. If investors know Intel will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Intel listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.72) | Dividend Share 0.74 | Earnings Share 0.4 | Revenue Per Share 12.942 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.097 |
The market value of Intel is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Intel that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Intel's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Intel's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Intel's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Intel's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Intel's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Intel is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Intel's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.