Interactive Brokers Company Insiders
| IBKR Stock | USD 110.60 1.37 1.25% |
Interactive Brokers' insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that virtually all Interactive Brokers Group insiders are, at present, panicking. Interactive Brokers employs about 2.9 K people. The company is managed by 16 executives with a total tenure of roughly 132 years, averaging almost 8.0 years of service per executive, having 183.25 employees per reported executive.
| Thomas Peterffy Chairman Founder, Chairman, CEO, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee |
| Earl Nemser Chairman Independent Vice Chairman of the Board |
Interactive Brokers' Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-02-21 | Earl H Nemser | Disposed 5000 @ 104.86 | View | ||
| 2024-02-15 | Earl H Nemser | Disposed 10000 @ 103.53 | View | ||
| 2024-02-13 | Earl H Nemser | Disposed 50000 @ 101.07 | View | ||
| 2024-02-05 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 36267 @ 95.64 | View | ||
| 2024-02-02 | Earl H Nemser | Disposed 74218 @ 96.29 | View | ||
| 2024-02-01 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 36883 @ 90.64 | View | ||
| 2024-01-29 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 46709 @ 90.58 | View | ||
| 2024-01-26 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 49081 @ 91.31 | View | ||
| 2024-01-24 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 44643 @ 91.62 | View | ||
| 2024-01-22 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 50300 @ 90.53 | View | ||
| 2024-01-18 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 12917 @ 88.68 | View | ||
| 2024-01-16 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 13189 @ 87.63 | View | ||
| 2024-01-12 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 13007 @ 88.3 | View | ||
| 2024-01-10 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 12827 @ 86.95 | View | ||
| 2024-01-08 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 13188 @ 86.96 | View | ||
| 2024-01-05 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 12827 @ 87.84 | View | ||
| 2024-01-03 | Thomas Aj Frank | Disposed 13189 @ 86.13 | View | ||
| 2023-11-06 | Paul Jonathan Brody | Disposed 9200 @ 80.27 | View | ||
| 2023-11-03 | Paul Jonathan Brody | Disposed 1083 @ 79.53 | View |
Monitoring Interactive Brokers' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Interactive |
Interactive Brokers' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Interactive Brokers' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Interactive will maintain a workforce of slightly above 2930 employees by May 2024.Interactive Brokers' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Interactive Brokers, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Interactive Brokers by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2020-05-08 | Representative Nancy Pelosi | Disposed $100K to $250K | Verify |
Interactive Brokers Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0231 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0231 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.2162 %, meaning that it created $0.2162 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Interactive Brokers' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Interactive Brokers manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 04/19/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.24. At this time, Interactive Brokers' Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 04/19/2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 14.6 B, though Other Current Assets are likely to grow to (114.3 B).As of 04/19/2024, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to grow to about 147.7 M. Also, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 359.1 M
Interactive Brokers Workforce Comparison
Interactive Brokers Group is rated fifth overall in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Financials industry is currently estimated at about 851,277. Interactive Brokers adds roughly 2,932 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Financials industry.
Interactive Brokers Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.14 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.72 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.72.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.99 | 0.9389 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0726 | 0.0764 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.8 | 0.8382 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.58 | 0.3907 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0044 | 0.0047 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | 0.1674 |
|
|
Interactive Brokers Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Interactive Brokers insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Interactive Brokers' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Interactive Brokers insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | 0.1566 | 13 | 83 | 214,687 | 467,733 |
| 2023-09-01 | 0.0645 | 4 | 62 | 2,070,822 | 862,811 |
| 2022-12-01 | 0.125 | 15 | 120 | 219,467 | 989,356 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.0278 | 1 | 36 | 1,000,000 | 400,000 |
| 2022-06-01 | 0.036 | 5 | 139 | 955.00 | 1,321,248 |
| 2021-12-01 | 0.0566 | 15 | 265 | 197,986 | 2,378,271 |
| 2021-09-01 | 0.0059 | 1 | 170 | 2,000,000 | 2,051,177 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.0463 | 10 | 216 | 11,453,569 | 1,407,135 |
| 2020-09-01 | 0.0417 | 1 | 24 | 1,000,000 | 958,886 |
| 2018-12-01 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 174,306 | 564.00 |
| 2018-09-01 | 0.1667 | 2 | 12 | 1,000,427 | 183,978 |
| 2018-06-01 | 0.2 | 1 | 5 | 360.00 | 121,512 |
| 2018-03-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 348.00 | 32,000 |
| 2017-12-01 | 0.1383 | 13 | 94 | 280,997 | 753,376 |
| 2017-09-01 | 0.0149 | 2 | 134 | 340,578 | 713,073 |
| 2017-06-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 1.00 | 64,052 |
| 2015-12-01 | 0.0276 | 5 | 181 | 417,643 | 697,186 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.0137 | 4 | 292 | 1,125,018 | 680,437 |
| 2014-12-01 | 0.066 | 7 | 106 | 456,998 | 215,212 |
| 2013-12-01 | 0.0438 | 6 | 137 | 948,065 | 361,577 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.025 | 2 | 80 | 5,000 | 52,600 |
| 2012-12-01 | 0.0532 | 5 | 94 | 473,135 | 345,600 |
| 2012-09-01 | 0.02 | 1 | 50 | 5,000 | 25,600 |
| 2012-03-01 | 0.0526 | 4 | 76 | 16,900 | 33,600 |
| 2009-06-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 76,697 | 18,611 |
| 2008-06-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 34,319 | 9,404 |
Interactive Brokers Notable Stakeholders
An Interactive Brokers stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Interactive Brokers often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Interactive Brokers' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Interactive Brokers' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Thomas Peterffy | Founder, Chairman, CEO, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee | Profile | |
| Earl Nemser | Independent Vice Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| Thomas Frank | CIO and Executive VP | Profile | |
| Paul Brody | CFO, Treasurer, Secretary and Director | Profile | |
| John Damgard | Director | Profile | |
| Philip Uhde | Director | Profile | |
| Milan Galik | Pres and Director | Profile | |
| Hans Stoll | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Richard Gates | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Gary Katz | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lawrence Harris | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
| Kenneth Winston | Director | Profile | |
| Wayne Wagner | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Friedland | Managing Operations | Profile | |
| Denis Mendonca | Chief Accounting Officer and Controller | Profile | |
| Nancy Stuebe | Director Relations | Profile |
About Interactive Brokers Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Interactive Brokers often depends on how effective the management is. Interactive Brokers management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Interactive management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Interactive management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0 | 0 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.26 | 0.24 | |
| Return On Assets | 0 | 0 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.17 | 0.14 |
The data published in Interactive Brokers' official financial statements usually reflect Interactive Brokers' business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Interactive Brokers. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Interactive accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Interactive Brokers' liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Capital Markets space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Interactive Brokers' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Interactive Brokers' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Interactive Brokers' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Interactive Brokers Group. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Interactive Brokers' management manipulating its earnings.
Interactive Brokers Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Interactive Brokers use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Interactive Brokers within its industry.Interactive Brokers Manpower Efficiency
Return on Interactive Brokers Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 2.7M | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 491M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 204.6K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 37.5M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 4M | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 732.4M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Interactive Brokers Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in industry. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Complementary Tools for Interactive Stock analysis
When running Interactive Brokers' price analysis, check to measure Interactive Brokers' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Interactive Brokers is operating at the current time. Most of Interactive Brokers' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Interactive Brokers' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Interactive Brokers' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Interactive Brokers to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Portfolio Anywhere Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm |
Is Interactive Brokers' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Interactive Brokers. If investors know Interactive will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Interactive Brokers listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.134 | Dividend Share 0.4 | Earnings Share 2.837 | Revenue Per Share 43.116 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.142 |
The market value of Interactive Brokers is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Interactive that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Interactive Brokers' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Interactive Brokers' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Interactive Brokers' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Interactive Brokers' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Interactive Brokers' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Interactive Brokers is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Interactive Brokers' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.