Graphic Packaging Company Leadership
| GPK Stock | USD 27.35 0.14 0.51% |
Graphic Packaging's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Graphic Packaging Holding stock suggests that most insiders are panicking at this time. Graphic Packaging employs about 23.5 K people. The company is managed by 34 executives with a total tenure of roughly 250 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 691.18 employees per reported executive.
| Michael Doss CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
| Philip Martens Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
Graphic Packaging's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
| 2024-02-27 | Joseph P Yost | Disposed 70000 @ 26.2 | View | ||
| 2023-10-11 | Jonathan L. Jackson | Disposed @ 21.32 | |||
| 2023-05-09 | Stephen R Scherger | Disposed 160492 @ 25.81 | View |
Monitoring Graphic Packaging's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Graphic |
Graphic Packaging's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Graphic Packaging's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Graphic will maintain a workforce of about 23500 employees by May 2024.Graphic Packaging's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Graphic Packaging Holding, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Graphic Packaging by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
| 2023-10-11 | Representative Jonathan Jackson | Disposed $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
| 2021-02-12 | Representative Susie Lee | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-14 | Senator David A Perdue , Jr | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify | ||
| 2020-04-14 | Senator David Perdue | Acquired $100K to $250K | Verify |
Graphic Packaging Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0752 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0752 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2932 %, implying that it generated $0.2932 on every 100 dollars invested. Graphic Packaging's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Graphic Packaging manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is expected to rise to 0.09 this year. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.16 this year. At this time, Graphic Packaging's Total Current Liabilities is quite stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is expected to rise to about 11.7 B this year, although the value of Non Current Liabilities Other will most likely fall to about 102.6 M.Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to rise to about 630.3 M this year, although the value of Common Stock Shares Outstanding will most likely fall to about 228.7 M.
Graphic Packaging Workforce Comparison
Graphic Packaging Holding is rated # 2 in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Materials industry is currently estimated at about 78,778. Graphic Packaging totals roughly 23,500 in number of employees claiming about 30% of all equities under Materials industry.
Graphic Packaging Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.08 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.14 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.14 of operating income.| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.2 | 0.2327 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0805 | 0.0767 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.15 | 0.1415 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.1 | 0.0989 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0679 | 0.0647 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.27 | 0.26 |
|
|
Graphic Packaging Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Graphic Packaging insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Graphic Packaging's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Graphic Packaging insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
| Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-01 | 1.0 | 21 | 21 | 1,256,458 | 744,081 |
| 2023-06-01 | 6.0 | 12 | 2 | 68,658 | 163,800 |
| 2023-03-01 | 1.0 | 19 | 19 | 1,138,791 | 674,631 |
| 2022-12-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 47,123 | 62,182 |
| 2022-09-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 1,431 | 59,677 |
| 2022-03-01 | 1.0 | 17 | 17 | 1,692,980 | 799,746 |
| 2021-12-01 | 3.5 | 7 | 2 | 40,846 | 16,575 |
| 2021-09-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 3,475 | 5,400 |
| 2021-06-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 107,835 | 7,511 |
| 2021-03-01 | 0.6522 | 15 | 23 | 1,052,137 | 964,677 |
| 2020-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 11,546 | 16,512 |
| 2020-06-01 | 1.4286 | 10 | 7 | 88,336 | 82,135 |
| 2020-03-01 | 0.9444 | 17 | 18 | 794,804 | 809,417 |
| 2019-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 134.16 | 34,674 |
| 2019-03-01 | 1.7368 | 33 | 19 | 1,623,279 | 394,537 |
| 2018-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 25,000 | 16,954 |
| 2018-06-01 | 7.0 | 7 | 1 | 51,226 | 101,303 |
| 2018-03-01 | 0.9355 | 29 | 31 | 1,185,139 | 955,462 |
| 2017-12-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 825.00 | 38,266 |
| 2017-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 840.00 | 0.00 |
| 2017-06-01 | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 58,219 | 10,982 |
| 2017-03-01 | 0.5897 | 23 | 39 | 1,467,421 | 1,269,662 |
| 2016-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 13,815 | 32,166 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2.0 | 8 | 4 | 52,993 | 329,774 |
| 2016-03-01 | 1.0417 | 25 | 24 | 3,075,699 | 2,931,944 |
| 2015-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 561.93 | 109,000 |
| 2015-09-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 13,742 | 127,276 |
| 2015-06-01 | 1.0 | 12 | 12 | 219,494 | 528,862 |
| 2015-03-01 | 1.2273 | 27 | 22 | 2,460,850 | 2,891,480 |
| 2014-09-01 | 0.1176 | 2 | 17 | 36,490 | 1,048,608 |
| 2014-06-01 | 0.8889 | 8 | 9 | 68,568 | 375,000 |
| 2014-03-01 | 0.8333 | 25 | 30 | 2,915,609 | 16,193,090 |
| 2013-09-01 | 0.1429 | 2 | 14 | 313,465 | 4,424,044 |
| 2013-06-01 | 1.5 | 15 | 10 | 1,192,420 | 11,637,319 |
| 2013-03-01 | 0.7045 | 31 | 44 | 3,309,773 | 25,083,861 |
| 2012-06-01 | 1.0 | 21 | 21 | 733,360 | 1,021,357 |
| 2012-03-01 | 1.6667 | 40 | 24 | 4,840,941 | 1,274,956 |
| 2011-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 100,000 | 20,000 |
| 2011-06-01 | 2.2 | 11 | 5 | 215,740 | 164,600 |
| 2011-03-01 | 8.3333 | 25 | 3 | 2,333,226 | 11,585 |
| 2010-06-01 | 1.625 | 13 | 8 | 321,873 | 69,709 |
| 2009-06-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 594,600 | 56,242 |
| 2009-03-01 | 2.9 | 29 | 10 | 2,666,217 | 553,830 |
| 2008-09-01 | 4.0 | 12 | 3 | 250,138 | 38,355 |
| 2008-06-01 | 1.5556 | 14 | 9 | 420,577 | 80,561 |
| 2008-03-01 | 0.5455 | 6 | 11 | 680,838 | 827,159 |
| 2007-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 26,359 | 24,700 |
| 2006-09-01 | 0.5 | 4 | 8 | 669,131 | 934,887 |
| 2006-06-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 119,983 | 1,300 |
| 2005-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 4,602 | 77,256 |
| 2005-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 63,076 | 60,840 |
| 2004-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 588.00 | 3,715 |
| 2004-03-01 | 3.5 | 7 | 2 | 19,961 | 10,639 |
| 2003-09-01 | 1.2941 | 22 | 17 | 2,380,786 | 751,765 |
Graphic Packaging Notable Stakeholders
A Graphic Packaging stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Graphic Packaging often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Graphic Packaging's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Graphic Packaging's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Michael Doss | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
| Philip Martens | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
| David Scheible | Chairman and CEO | Profile | |
| Lauren Tashma | Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
| Joseph Yost | Executive Vice President, President - Americas Converting | Profile | |
| Michael Ukropina | Senior Vice President-Consumer Packaging | Profile | |
| Stacey Panayiotou | Executive Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
| Hilde Moeseke | Senior Vice President and Presidentident - Europe, Middle East and Africa | Profile | |
| Carla Chaney | Executive Vice President - Human Resource | Profile | |
| Michael Schmal | Senior Vice President - Beverage Packaging Division | Profile | |
| Michael Farrell | Executive Vice President - Mills Division | Profile | |
| Stephen Scherger | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
| Paul McCann | Senior Vice President - Supply Chain | Profile | |
| Alan Nichols | Sr. VP of Mills Division | Profile | |
| Larry Venturelli | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Laurie Brlas | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Harold Logan | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Jeffrey Coors | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Paul Carrico | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Dean Scarborough | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Lynn Wentworth | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Andrea Botta | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Mary Rhinehart | Independent Director | Profile | |
| David Campbell | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Peter Kelly | Director | Profile | |
| Robert Hagemann | Independent Director | Profile | |
| JeanFrancois Roche | Senior Vice President and Presidentident, Europe, Middle East and Africa | Profile | |
| Melanie Skijus | Vice Relations | Profile | |
| Alex Ovshey | IR Contact Officer | Profile | |
| Aziz Aghili | Independent Director | Profile | |
| Charles Lischer | Senior Officer | Profile | |
| Elizabeth Spence | Executive Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
| Maggie Bidlingmaier | Executive Vice President and Presidentident - Americas | Profile | |
| Vishwanath Narendra | Senior Officer | Profile |
About Graphic Packaging Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Graphic Packaging Holding often depends on how effective the management is. Graphic Packaging management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Graphic management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Graphic management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Return On Tangible Assets | 0.09 | 0.09 | |
| Return On Capital Employed | 0.16 | 0.16 | |
| Return On Assets | 0.06 | 0.07 | |
| Return On Equity | 0.26 | 0.27 |
The data published in Graphic Packaging's official financial statements usually reflect Graphic Packaging's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Graphic Packaging Holding. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Graphic accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Graphic Packaging's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Containers & Packaging space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Graphic Packaging's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Graphic Packaging's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Graphic Packaging's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Graphic Packaging Holding. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Graphic Packaging's management manipulating its earnings.
Graphic Packaging Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Graphic Packaging use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Graphic Packaging within its industry.Graphic Packaging Manpower Efficiency
Return on Graphic Packaging Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 401.2K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 277.3M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 30.8K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 21.3M | |
| Working Capital Per Employee | 10.9K | |
| Working Capital Per Executive | 7.5M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Graphic Packaging Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in american community survey. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.
Complementary Tools for Graphic Stock analysis
When running Graphic Packaging's price analysis, check to measure Graphic Packaging's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Graphic Packaging is operating at the current time. Most of Graphic Packaging's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Graphic Packaging's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Graphic Packaging's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Graphic Packaging to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
| ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments |
Is Graphic Packaging's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Graphic Packaging. If investors know Graphic will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Graphic Packaging listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.26 | Dividend Share 0.4 | Earnings Share 2.34 | Revenue Per Share 30.591 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.06) |
The market value of Graphic Packaging Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Graphic that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Graphic Packaging's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Graphic Packaging's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Graphic Packaging's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Graphic Packaging's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Graphic Packaging's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Graphic Packaging is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Graphic Packaging's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.